This article presents the benefits of a nonlinear approach for the analysis of reinforced concrete line elements, intended to determine the unique solution of the mechanical problem — when it exists — by enforcing flexural and axial deformation compatibility at every point along the member.

Inspired by the General Method and fully covered by Eurocode 2, this approach, referred to as the “Integral General Method” or IGM, opens up possibilities for analysing and optimising many common situations, from slender columns to continuous members in combined bending and compression.

The behaviour of reinforced concrete flexural structures is intrinsically non-linear and depends on cracking and the progressive plastification of sections.

Compared with earlier generation codes (BAEL), Eurocode 2 now benefits from the theoretical contributions required to take these phenomena into account, notably enabling the calculation-based treatment of concrete adaptation, the formation of plastic hinges, moment redistribution, as well as deformation compatibility issues.

Depending on the required level of analysis, the code also allows simplified, regulated methods based on linear-elastic analyses, possibly combined with predefined moment redistributions.

These various approaches provide the calculation framework with a certain versatility and give the engineer a degree of flexibility suited to the diversity of situations encountered in practice.

While simplified analysis methods (§5.4 to §5.6) are widely used in practice, the present study proposes to utilize non-linear methods (§5.7) on simple cases in order to progressively highlight the mechanisms underlying structural analysis according to EC2, and to provide additional insight into linear-elastic analyses and redistribution practices.

The relationship between structural works and special foundations relies largely on the Load Transfer Document (LTD), which, beyond a simple listing, can play a truly structuring role in the project design and in defining the interface between trades.

When advantageously supplemented with information such as execution tolerance management and the stiffness to consider at the top of each pile, the LTD becomes a key element — relayed by the technical specifications (STS) — to clarify the boundary between trades and secure the design.

This article provides specific insight into these sometimes‑confusing geometric, mechanical, and contractual aspects, and shows the value of documenting them early on.